Mati Greenspan, founder of Quantum Economics: „There is a real possibility of days with increases of 250% or more“

In a newsletter published yesterday, the founder of Quantum Economics explained that Bitcoin’s recent rise above $23,000 (an increase of about 29% in one week) does not necessarily mean that the market is „overheated“ and destined to crash, as it did in December 2017.

„In our view, this is just the beginning,“ Greenspan said. „We probably shouldn’t use comparisons to the past to determine possible percentage increases.“

Continuing, he added:

„If demand continues to rise and supply continues to fall, there is a real possibility of days with increases of 250% or even more.“

Greenspan pointed out that „no one can predict“ when (and if) Bitcoin’s (BTC) trend will turn bearish, but the price could reach „anywhere between $23,800 and $1 million per coin.“ He also didn’t rule out what Guggenheim Partners‘ Scott Miner suggested, that the crypto asset „should be worth around $400,000.“

„Now that we have surpassed the previous all-time high, there are no levels left on the chart that could indicate where the price will end its climb,“ Greenspan explained. „Eventually, it will reach its high. There’s no doubt about that.“

Other figures in the crypto sector, such as Binance US CEO Catherine Coley, see Bitcoin’s current bull run as evidence of its sustained growth:

„While the Fed and other government agencies around the world seem not to care about the consequences of inflation on fiat currencies, we will continue to see the consolidation of the argument for diversification into BTC, and the price will surpass fundamental technical levels.“

At the time of publication, Bitcoin’s price stands at $23,060, after a 9.2% increase in the last 48 hours.

First, we asked Axel Simon about the latest accusations made by Bruno Le Maire , Minister of the Economy in France. Recently, Bruno Le Maire has indeed committed to fight against the financing of Islamist terrorism via cryptocurrencies. According to him, terrorists use cryptoassets like Bitcoin to finance their activities.

Bruno Le Maire accuses cryptocurrencies of financing terrorism, while the crypto sector is already highly regulated. Is this an excuse to impose new restrictions?

I had not seen this ad, nor do I follow the news closely. Already, to be clear enough, La Quadrature does not have a determined and clear-cut position on cryptocurrencies and on blockchain issues in general. We are interested, but we don’t really have an overall position. We haven’t really taken an interest in it yet as a collective.

But yes, indeed, the entry points of many cryptocurrencies are still well regulated at the present time with everything that is against money laundering in particular. After that, the concrete operation of the majority of Crypto Legacy is that the traces of almost everything that is done are kept, except on a minority of cryptocurrencies which are not the most popular to my knowledge. So I find that this is an advertisement which is not very interesting. I mean, we know that organized crime does not usually go through cryptocurrency to finance itself . There are more pressing questions about tax havens and even the big banks that turn a blind eye when similar things happen., not necessarily on terrorism, but on crime in general. It is not very relevant.

The digital yuan and Chinese social credit digital yuan

Then we brought up the subject of the digital yuan and Chinese social credit. Indeed, China is currently testing a central bank digital currency in several cities in its territory. Coupled with social credit and a blockchain centralizing all information concerning citizens , this crypto-yuan represents a danger to privacy and freedom.

What does the use of blockchain as a tool for mass surveillance in China inspire you, with in particular the appearance of Chinese social credit and the digital yuan?

I don’t see the connection with blockchains because a blockchain is always a system that works on decentralization, that’s the only sense in which it’s useful. When it’s a single entity and organization, the Chinese government, that can force everyone to use a single system, it doesn’t matter if it’s a blockchain underneath. Whether it is a blockchain or a centralized database, it comes down to the same thing because we have a single actor who controls the information, access to information or writes information, and beyond that who controls whether the population is forced to use the system. In fact, the blockchain part in there is secondary, the real question is completely political, it is outside of what is generally linked to blockchains. Technically, if it’s a blockchain below, why not, but the problem is not at all on this technical aspect,

Finally, a centralized blockchain is not a real blockchain?

Yes, that’s it. The whole point of a blockchain is to have several nodes that belong to different entities so that they can together keep a vision of reality, and of the truth with a small v. And thus avoid that only one of the entities of the group can make lie the archives in large, in a way too easy or invisible. And there, it is totally under the control of the Chinese government, therefore of the same organization … it has no technical interest.

Do you think that a system like Chinese social credit could be implemented elsewhere in the world, including in Europe?

Good question ! I think people would care a lot about it, but you can also get people to do a lot of things with the right incentives, giving people benefits for example, but not in the same way. We are already seeing bits and pieces of this system: there are a lot of people who use loyalty cards in stores. It serves to encourage them to come back and therefore to change their behavior. It is always slight changes in Western countries rather than profound changes, that would be too visible. And these bits and pieces are called to progress because people don’t think too much about it. But it will probably not be managed by a central authority that controls and sees everything. Rather, they will be intertwining of the economic interests of different companies. But there will be similar things.

Der Ausbruch von Bitcoin in der vergangenen Woche hat die Aufmerksamkeit derjenigen innerhalb und außerhalb dieser Branche auf sich gezogen . CNBC und Bloomberg berichteten ausführlich über diese Aufwärtsbewegungen, und JP Morgan und andere Wall Street-Investmentfirmen und -Analytiker belasteten die Rallye.

Analysten sagen, dass es noch nicht an der Zeit ist, ganz aufgeregt zu sein. Viele Kommentatoren sagen, dass Bitcoin, das 14.000 US-Dollar bricht, wichtig sein wird, da dieses Niveau in den letzten drei Jahren von makroökonomischer Bedeutung war.

Wird die Hölle losbrechen, wenn Bitcoin 14.000 Dollar erreicht?

Der bekannte Krypto-Asset-Analyst Qiao Wang glaubt, dass der Markt, sobald Bitcoin 14.000 US-Dollar bricht, in ein „ anderes Regime in Bezug auf Volatilität, Dynamik, Beteiligung des Einzelhandels usw.“ eintreten wird :

Sobald BTC 14.000 US-Dollar durchbricht, werden wir uns wahrscheinlich in einem anderen Regime in Bezug auf Volatilität, Dynamik, Beteiligung des Einzelhandels usw. befinden. Viele Dinge, die in den letzten Monaten funktioniert haben, funktionieren möglicherweise nicht mehr und umgekehrt. 20.000 US-Dollar werden dieses Regime auf ein ganz neues Niveau bringen. Nur eine Ahnung.

Wir werden sehen

Der Grund, warum ein solcher Schwerpunkt auf 14.000 US-Dollar gelegt wird, ist, dass dies der Punkt war, an dem die Bitcoin-Kerze vom Dezember 2017 geschlossen wurde, und dass der Trend während des Booms von 2019 fast perfekt übertroffen wurde. Die mehrfachen Makrointeraktionen, die BTC bei 14.000 USD hatte, deuten darauf hin, dass ein entscheidendes Brechen und Halten über diesem Niveau eine Verschiebung der Marktstruktur bedeuten würde.

Während Qiao Wang nicht näher darauf einging, welche Art von Trends sich auf dem Kryptomarkt ändern werden, ist es erwähnenswert, dass es nur ein geringes Futures-Volumen gibt, das über 14.000 USD gehandelt wurde.

Der Analyst „CL“ teilte die nachstehende Grafik inmitten des Anstiegs von Bitcoin in der vergangenen Woche mit und stellte fest, dass „fast niemand auf dem aktuellen Derivatemarkt jemals sinnvoll über dem aktuellen Niveau gehandelt hat“.

Dasvidania to gold? – Although the Russian authorities are not making life easier for crypto enthusiasts, they still seem very interested in digital assets. So, in a study of the preferred assets of Russian investors, Bitcoin and its ilk received slightly more approval than gold itself.

17% of Russian investors buy cryptos

The World Gold Council is an organization dedicated to the gold market . He just published a report on the most popular investments in Russia.

In all, 2,023 investors were surveyed online about their investing habits.

“The rise of cryptocurrencies demonstrates that there is a desire for choice and attraction among retail investors. „- Report of the World Gold Council

Indeed, we discover that cryptocurrencies are the fifth preferred asset of Russian investors, just ahead of gold. 17% of respondents say they have invested in Crypto Engine reviews in the past 12 months, compared to 16% for gold .

The adoption of cryptocurrencies in Russia is debatable

Despite a very restrictive regulatory framework , the country of Vladimir Putin would nonetheless remain rather advanced in the adoption of cryptocurrencies. As a Chainalysis report showed in September, on-chain transactions are very high there , in proportion to the purchasing power of the inhabitants.

The World Gold Council report gives what is certainly a major factor in this surge in crypto adoption: the appeal of the younger generations .

“18-24 year olds are much more willing to take risks to obtain an exponential return (…) around 2 thirds consider investing in cryptocurrencies. “

Bit Gold Bitcoin Or

Therefore, even if 75% of investors think that gold never loses value in the long term and that 68% consider the precious metal as a good protection against inflation , cryptocurrencies seem to them as an opportunity to even more interesting investment .

China’s growing interest in blockchain technology is also spreading among companies listed on regulated markets.

Securities Daily has published a report highlighting how Chinese listed companies are spending the millions of dollars they have allocated to blockchain research and development; the contribution is based on the testimony of 23 Chinese companies that have started working in the sector since 2016. The figures suggest that companies spend an average of 20% of their annual revenues for these purposes, and that the majority of Financial Peak these funds are spent on the development of government projects.

The paper found that Yuanguang Software, a provider of enterprise programs, has increased its research spending by approximately $24.3 million since 2016. Other companies, such as Xinchen Technology, have invested significant amounts in blockchain-related government projects in an effort to strengthen the country’s financial sector.

Chen Xiaohua, chairman of the Blockchain Professional Committee of the China Mobile Communications Federation, commented on the increased interest in the blockchain among Chinese companies:

„On the one hand, listed companies can use blockchain technology to improve their products. Awareness and brand promotion, on the other hand, use blockchain technology to improve their technology level, break the structural constraints of the traditional Internet model and create an in-depth layout of the digital economy“.
According to a paper entitled „2020 Blockchain Industry Development“, Chinese companies have applied for 4,435 blockchain patents, more than half of all blockchain applications worldwide. This surge in interest was probably a consequence of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s official endorsement of the technology.

Darkside-hackargruppen bakom det senaste säkerhetsbrottet mot den populära handelsappen Robinhood har gett en del av sin Bitcoin-lösen till två välgörenhetsorganisationer, Children International och The Water Project.

En rapport från BBC sa att hackarna publicerade kvitton som visade 0.88BTC donerade till varje välgörenhetsorganisation via The Giving Block, en USA-baserad tjänst som accepterar kryptodonationer för över 67 välgörenhetsorganisationer runt om i världen.

Darkside-hackare håller Bitcoin Profit gisslan tills lösen betalas men hävdar att de inte har några dolda motiv för att ge till välgörenhet.

Eftersom de har gjort en förmögenhet som endast riktar sig mot stora lönsamma företag sa hackarna att de tror att det bara är rättvist att några av de utpressade medlen går till välgörenhet.

”Oavsett hur illa du tycker att vårt arbete är, är vi glada att veta att vi har hjälpt till att förändra någons liv. Idag skickar vi de första donationerna. ”

Children International vägrar den olagliga BTC-donationen

Children International är en global ideell organisation med säte i Kansas City som försöker hjälpa barn att bryta cykeln av fattigdom.
Annons

Det stöder barn, deras familjer och samhällen globalt, inklusive i USA, Mexiko, Colombia, Ecuador, Filippinerna och Dominikanska republiken.

Ideell organisation har dock vägrat att acceptera den anonyma donationen, enligt dess talesman.

„Om donationen är kopplad till en hackare har vi ingen avsikt att behålla.“

Giving Block sa att företaget inte var medveten om att medlen kom från cyberbrottslingar och gick så långt som att radera en tweet som visar att Darkside verkligen hade donerat till nämnda välgörenhetsorganisationer.

„Om det visar sig att dessa donationer gjordes med stulna medel, kommer vi naturligtvis att börja arbetet med att återlämna dem till den rättmätiga ägaren.“

Vattenprojektet, som arbetar i Afrika söder om Sahara för att ge tillförlitlig tillgång till rent vatten och sanitet, har ännu inte kommenterat sin donation.

The Darkside: Conscious Hackers

Analytiker har sagt att Darkside är en relativt ny hackargrupp, men det är bland de snabbast kommande cyberbrottslingarna som riktar sig till fintech- och kryptoföretag.

På deras hemsida insisterar Darkside på att de har principer och inte skulle attackera organisationer som arbetar med utbildning, medicin, ideella organisationer eller statliga institutioner.

Vi attackerar endast mål som kan betala det begärda beloppet. Vi vill inte döda ditt företag. ”

Men enligt Brett Callow, hotanalytiker på Emsisoft Cyber ​​Security Company, är hackarnas filantropiska avsikter oklara för många analytiker.

„Oavsett deras motiv är det verkligen ett mycket ovanligt steg och är så vitt jag vet första gången en ransomwaregrupp donerade en del av sin vinst till välgörenhet.“

Tezos s’échange entre le support et la résistance à 1,70 $ et 2,80 $, respectivement.

Les délais à long terme montrent une faiblesse considérable.

XTZ / BTC se négocie entre 16 500 et 24 000 satoshis

Vouloir en savoir davantage? Rejoignez notre groupe Bitcoin Trader et obtenez des signaux de trading, un cours de trading gratuit et une communication quotidienne avec les fans de crypto!

Le Trust Project est un consortium international d’organisations de presse établissant des normes de transparence.

Le prix du Tezos (XTZ) est en baisse depuis qu’il a été rejeté par un niveau de résistance Fib important. Bien que des augmentations à court terme puissent survenir, il semble que la tendance à long terme soit baissière.

Le prix XTZ a atteint un sommet de 4,49 $ le 13 août et diminue depuis. Le sommet a été atteint au niveau de 0,618 Fib de l’ensemble du mouvement à la baisse précédent, ce qui a provoqué un fort rejet.

Faiblesse à long terme de Tezos

Le plus haut a été combiné à une divergence baissière du RSI et du MACD, ce dernier étant déjà devenu négatif.

Cela indique qu’une diminution vers la zone de 1,50 $ pour valider la ligne de soutien ascendant à long terme est le scénario le plus probable.

Le 4 septembre, le prix est tombé de la zone de support de 2,80 $ et de la ligne de support ascendante en place depuis mars.

XTZ a poursuivi sa descente à un rythme accéléré depuis.

La zone de support principale se trouve à 1,70 $, soit le niveau Fib de 0,786 de l’ensemble du mouvement à la hausse et d’une zone de résistance précédente. Cette résistance est désormais susceptible de servir de support une fois testée.

Les indicateurs techniques sont haussiers:

Ce sont des signes qu’après une baisse possible vers le support de 1,70 $, le prix est susceptible de tester à nouveau la résistance de 2,80 $. La tendance à long terme reste toujours baissière.

Le trader en crypto- monnaie @Cryptotoni_ a décrit un graphique XTZ, indiquant que le prix a atteint un sommet et devrait bientôt reprendre son mouvement à la baisse.

Depuis le plus haut du 13 août susmentionné, il semble que XTZ ait entamé une impulsion baissière (en noir ci-dessous), avec une troisième vague étendue (bleue).

Si le décompte est correct, alors XTZ est probablement dans la vague 4 actuellement, qui devrait se terminer entre 2,71 $ et 2,96 $, le niveau Fib 0,382-0,5 de la vague 2.

Par la suite, le prix devrait terminer la dernière étape vers le bas, le portant entre 1,50 $ et 1,70 $. Cette zone est une confluence de la ligne de support ascendante à long terme décrite dans la première section et la zone de support de la deuxième section.